On the whole, the academic paper is not a very suitable vehicle for synthetic philosophy, because it gives insufficient space to make all the necessary links. Academic journals generally require a detailed engagement with the specialised literature in one area (even when they are supposedly inter-disciplinary), and thus offer no scope for simultaneously questioning the interdependent assumptions made in different areas. For that reason, Robert has pretty much given up on trying to publish in academic journals. In earlier years, however, he did publish a few papers in peer-reviewed publications, and he has also published a few more recent ones on Researchgate and Academia. The papers listed here are in reverse date order. The earlier ones are only of interest as a record of the process of how he reached his current positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reason is not objectivity: A response to Julian Baggini’s narrowly rational criteria for objectivity (2017)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Cognitive error as absolutisation: An argument that cognitive biases and fallacies should be understood in terms of absolutisation (2015)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Challenging misunderstandings of scepticism (2015)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
A disproof of representationalism (2015)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Middle Way Philosophy and Objectivity (2011)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Taking the ‘meta’ out of physics: A response to Graham Smetham (2011: published in <\/strong>Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research<\/strong><\/em> 2:8)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Should Western Buddhists be Christians? (2008)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Four errors in traditional Buddhist thinking (2008)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
The notion of psychological objectivity as a key to the heuristic process (2003)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
A non-dualist approach to environmental ethics (2003)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
A palace built on sand: <\/strong> A Review of <\/strong>Transformations of Mind: Philosophy as Spiritual Practice<\/strong><\/em> by Michael McGhee, with some reflections on a Buddhist view of Analytic philosophy (2002)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Why Buddhists should be philosophers; and why philosophers should be Buddhists (2000)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Lakatos and non-dualist ethics (2000 – winning essay in the Charles Wei-hsun Fu Essay Contest)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
Parfit and the Buddha: Identity and Identification in <\/strong>Reasons and Persons<\/strong><\/em> (2000: published in <\/strong>Contemporary Buddhism 1:1<\/strong><\/em>)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
How Buddhist was Plato? (1999: published in Western Buddhist Review 4)<\/strong><\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\ufeffRevelation, Wisdom, and Learning from Religion: A response to D.G.Attfield (1997: published in <\/strong>British Journal of Religious Education<\/strong><\/em> 19:2<\/strong>)

<\/a>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On the whole, the academic paper is not a very suitable vehicle for synthetic philosophy, because it gives insufficient space to make all the necessary links. Academic journals generally require a detailed engagement with the specialised literature in one area (even when they are supposedly inter-disciplinary), and thus offer no scope for simultaneously questioning the […]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":400,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_oct_exclude_from_cache":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-408","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/408"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=408"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/408\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":482,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/408\/revisions\/482"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.robertmellis.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}